
A Lifetime of Advocacy
I started as a USPS Mail Handler — on the workroom floor, not in an office. I learned the grievance process from the ground up, then earned my JD to master the rules that management uses against workers. I have resigned from the Bar to retire, but I am not done with justice. I consult for federal and postal employees who have been mistreated, providing technical drafting and procedural guidance to level the playing field.
Management’s Playbook — and How I Counter It
Management runs the same traps repeatedly: procedural dismissals on technicalities, investigation reports that bury key evidence, deliberate delays, and after-the-fact justifications that contradict the record.
Agencies also routinely dismiss complaints for “untimeliness” or “failure to state a claim” without meeting their own burden under 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107. I audit timelines, draft rebuttals, and remind the OFO that the burden of proof belongs to the Agency — not you. The same applies to MSPB and OWCP cases.
What I Do
I help pro se federal employees get professional-quality EEOC, MSPB, and OWCP documents — briefs, procedural inquiries, and appeals — without law firm prices. Three decades of USPS experience gives me particular depth in postal cases.
What I Am — and Am Not
I am an administrative consultant, not a licensed attorney or courtroom litigator. I resigned from the California State Bar and consult as permitted by federal law. I handle only federal administrative matters — no state law, no general practice.
I draft technical narratives and procedural arguments from your facts. You review, revise, and file them yourself as a self-represented litigant.
IMPORTANT LEGAL DISCLOSURES
Non-Attorney Status: Consultant is a non-attorney consultant and a resigned former attorney member of the State Bar of California. He is not currently licensed to practice law in any jurisdiction and absolutely does not hold himself out as an active licensed attorney.
Federal Preemption: Services are limited strictly to federal administrative matters (EEOC/MSPB/OWCP) in a Non-Attorney role as authorized by federal regulations (29 C.F.R. § 1614.605, 5 C.F.R. § 1201.31 and 20 CFR § 10.700(a)). This work is conducted under the federal preemption doctrine established in Sperry v. Florida ex rel. Florida Bar, 373 U.S. 379 (1963).
No State Law Advice: Consultant does not provide advice on California state law nor the laws of any states or territory under American jurisdiction and does not represent clients in state or federal courts.
No Attorney-Client Relationship: Because Consultant is not a licensed attorney, no attorney-client relationship shall ever be formed under any circumstances whatsoever. Nothing in this communication via this website or service agreement is intended to create an attorney-client relationship. No such relationship shall ever be formed under any circumstances whatsoever. All deliverables are preliminary drafts for the client’s review, consideration and adoption or modification. Client retains absolute sole control over his or her case as a pro se litigant.